(with thanks to Rafael Aguayo for some key insights)
(image from NASA)
First and foremost, is the system one is measuring under control, as you should know, if not, there is nothing that can be learned which can be used for prediction, the essence of process control, management and science, beyond, it is out of control! Manipulating data to make an out of control system look in control is always tempting, especially the farther the measurer is removed from the context, from where the events being measured actually take place, and have real world ramifications: Ohno's gemba.
Performance evaluations, goals, ranking, etc. have nothing to do with improving performance, they are tools of power in a command and control structure for those who do not know what to do, but feel they have to do something. The odds of just doing something are 98% that you will only make things worse. And yet we continue in our convictions, despite clear and potent evidence to the contrary.
How's that working for us?
Maugham put it succinctly..
"I have never had any sympathy with the ascetic attitude. The wise man combines the pleasures of the senses and the pleasures of the spirit in such a way as to increase the satisfaction he gets from both.
Hmmm
Small family farms are important to a free nation, and a safe, secure food supply. (They are not multi-national corporations and cannot afford to have lobbyists or research institutions, so we sometimes forget their importance.)
They provide real diversity in our agricultural economy. Those that focus on dairy have been able to save their farms, and to a degree their rural communities, by producing artisan cheese as part of the renaissance of artisan cheese over the last 20 years. For the first time in a generation, the loss of family farms has slowed, a bit: people are actually returning to farms to produce artisan cheese.